|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 12:55:16 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 26, 2005 12:55:16 GMT -5
THIS IS IN SIM, NOT REAL LIFE
Just wanting to settle a debate, on which should be valued more, TB said if he trade Young for Stewart it would screw him over. I believe that having a 3rd base spect with the editor projecting higher avg, and power with basically equal OBP as a third baseman/first baseman would be better then having one at RF.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:01:17 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 26, 2005 13:01:17 GMT -5
also to help in voting I am going to post the editor numbers for avg. and HR's for both players so nobody has to bring up the editor to see them. Stewart 3rd baseman/1st baseman- BA vs. L- .304 BA vs. R- .336
HR- 53
Delmon Young RF - BA vs. L- .324 BA vs. R- .309
HR-51
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:08:18 GMT -5
Post by dustdevil16 on Feb 26, 2005 13:08:18 GMT -5
im thinking if stewart is so dang good then y does he have to hype him up and talk all this gold about him and not let u ppl think for urselves....
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:11:07 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 26, 2005 13:11:07 GMT -5
I am not hyping up Stewart or talking gold, all I did was post the stats for both players, if you think that is hyping up my player, and putting yours down, then that means you think that stat wise Stewart is better.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:12:25 GMT -5
Post by dustdevil16 on Feb 26, 2005 13:12:25 GMT -5
i dont think stewart is better... delmon young is the better spect END OF STORY
My minor leagues hasnt played much this year but in 2 AB Delmon Young has more HR than Stewart does in 28 AB....
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:15:16 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 26, 2005 13:15:16 GMT -5
One sim means nothing, if you are telling me that you value a player that hits a HR his first only AB then I would like to bring a former Yankee to your attention that hit a HR his first AB in ML against Randy Johnson during interleague play, and has yet to do anything else substantial, so go trade for him.
Ian Stewart is better spect, numbers prove it, no matter what the vote count comes out, numbers are what counts, and just look at the editor, and I believe 99% of the league would rather have a power hitting, great avg. hitting 3rd baseman/1st baseman over a power hitting great avg. hitting RF, since RF are a dime a dozen, and a great 3rd baseman 1st baseman are harder to find. Even if the numbers were even, which Stewart gets the slight edge in #'s, his position is more valuable. End of Story.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:32:25 GMT -5
Post by Dave Stieb on Feb 26, 2005 13:32:25 GMT -5
If you don't want Ian Stuart, then I'll trade for him. Actually, I wouldn't mind both players, but I already have a glut of OFers. Col.- if the deal falls through... look me up.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 13:34:09 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 26, 2005 13:34:09 GMT -5
lol, I am not actually trading Stewart for Young, we were just having an argument about who was better.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 26, 2005 19:49:11 GMT -5
Post by Bill Stoneman on Feb 26, 2005 19:49:11 GMT -5
I call them equal. Ian may be a little better of a hitter, but 1B are NOT at all hard to find....3B are a little, but you say 1B like they're hard to get. Just look at your draft. LOL.
Young has a cannon arm (8.8..Ian does too but not as good), Great range, a MUCH better glove, will be able to play CF if he trains him there, and solid speed (4.8). He also strikes out alot less.
So Ian's a better hitter, but all around Young evens it out. I don't really think one is better than the other.
|
|
|
Spects
Feb 27, 2005 21:05:48 GMT -5
Post by Darryl Strawberry on Feb 27, 2005 21:05:48 GMT -5
actually what I was saying was that Ian is more versatile being eligible at bost 3rd and first, and Young only being completely eligible at RF, RF'ers are much easier to find then a Great 3rd baseman. I would much rather have a great 3rd baseman bat on my team filled, cause it is harder to find, as to a good bat at RF is really easy to get, I am not saying Young is a slouch, but I would find it more productive to have a great bat at 3rd base then any OF position.
|
|
|
Spects
May 16, 2005 15:52:08 GMT -5
Post by Jose Canseco on May 16, 2005 15:52:08 GMT -5
Young hands down is the better spec...young's got more tools then Stewart(stewart has NO glove and at 3b thats a must have)
both can knock the snot off the ball...but young's better
Dan O'Brien
|
|
|
Spects
May 16, 2005 16:26:05 GMT -5
Post by Bill Stoneman on May 16, 2005 16:26:05 GMT -5
This debate is still raging on?
|
|
|
Spects
May 16, 2005 16:32:11 GMT -5
Post by Jose Canseco on May 16, 2005 16:32:11 GMT -5
I just noticed it so I thought id give my 2 cents worth
Dan O'Brien
|
|